SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain radio-probe: a non-invasive approach for angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 mapping in mice.

The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 interacts with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) of human respiratory epithelial cells, which leads to infection. Furthermore, low-dose radiation has been found to reduce inflammation and aid the curing of COVID-19. The receptor binding domain (RBD), a recombinant spike protein with a His tag at the C-terminus, binds to ACE2 in human body. We thus constructed a radioiodinated RBD as a molecule-targeted probe to non-invasively explore ACE2 expression in vivo, and to investigate radiotherapy pathway for inhibiting ACE2. RBD was labeled with [124I]NaI using an N-bromosuccinimide (NBS)-mediated method, and 124I-RBD was obtained after purification with a specific activity of 28.9 GBq/nmol. Its radiochemical purity was (RCP) over 90% in saline for 5 days. The dissociation constant of 124I-RBD binding to hACE2 was 75.7 nM. The uptake of 124I-RBD by HeLaACE+ cells at 2 h was 2.96% ± 0.35%, which could be substantially blocked by an excessive amount of RBD, and drop to 1.71% ± 0.23%. In BALB/c mice, the biodistribution of 124I-RBD after intravenous injection showed a moderate metabolism rate, and its 24 h-post injection (p.i.) organ distribution was similar to the expression profile in body. Micro-PET imaging of mice after intrapulmonary injection showed high uptake of lung at 1, 4, 24 h p.i.. In conclusion, the experimental results demonstrate the potential of 124I-RBD as a novel targeted molecular probe for COVID-19. This probe may be used for non-invasive ACE2 mapping in mammals.

Testing facility location and dynamic capacity planning for pandemics with demand uncertainty.

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has seriously affected the whole world, and epidemic research has attracted increasing amounts of scholarly attention. Critical facilities such as warehouses to store emergency supplies and testing or vaccination sites could help to control the spread of COVID-19. This paper focuses on how to locate the testing facilities to satisfy the varying demand, i.e., test kits, caused by pandemics. We propose a two-phase optimization framework to locate facilities and adjust capacity during large-scale emergencies. During the first phase, the initial prepositioning strategies are determined to meet predetermined fill-rate requirements using the sample average approximation formulation. We develop an online convex optimization-based Lagrangian relaxation approach to solve the problem. Specifically, to overcome the difficulty that all scenarios should be addressed simultaneously in each iteration, we adopt an online gradient descent algorithm, in which a near-optimal approximation for a given Lagrangian dual multiplier is constructed. During the second phase, the capacity to deal with varying demand is adjusted dynamically. To overcome the inaccuracy of long-term prediction, we design a dynamic allocation policy and adaptive dynamic allocation policy to adjust the policy to meet the varying demand with only one day's prediction. A comprehensive case study with the threat of COVID-19 is conducted. Numerical results have verified that the proposed two-phase framework is effective in meeting the varying demand caused by pandemics. Specifically, our adaptive policy can achieve a solution with only a 3.3% gap from the optimal solution with perfect information.

Immunogenicity and Safety of a SARS-CoV-2 Inactivated Vaccine in Healthy Adults Aged 18-59 years: Report of the Randomized, Double-blind, and Placebo-controlled Phase 2 Clinical Trial (preprint)

BACKGROUND The top priority for the control of COVID-19 pandemic currently is the development of a vaccine. A phase 2 trial conducted to further evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of a SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac). METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the optimal dose, immunogenicity and safety of the CoronaVac. A total of 600 healthy adults aged 18-59 years were randomly assigned to receive 2 injections of the trial vaccine at a dose of 3 g/0.5 mL or 6 g /0.5mL, or placebo on Day 0,14 schedule or Day 0,28 schedule. For safety evaluation, solicited and unsolicited adverse events were collected after each vaccination within 7 days and 28 days, respectively. Blood samples were taken for antibody assay. RESULTS CoronaVac was well tolerated, and no dose-related safety concerns were observed. Most of the adverse reactions fell in the solicited category and were mild in severity. Pain at injection site was the most frequently reported symptoms. No Grade 3 adverse reaction or vaccine related SAEs were reported. CoronaVac showed good immunogenicity with the lower 3 g dose eliciting 92.4% seroconversion under Day 0,14 schedule and 97.4% under Day 0,28 schedule. 28 days after two-dose vaccination, the Nab levels of individual schedules range from 23.8 to 65.4 among different dosage and vaccination schedules. CONCLUSIONS Favorable safety and immunogenicity of CoronaVac was demonstrated on both schedules and both dosages, which support the conduction of phase 3 trial with optimum schedule/dosage per different scenarios.